Looks like a classic case of "too much Chiefs and not enough Indians".
Moderators should be fair in all aspects (unbias) and insure that the Registration Agreement Terms are met. That's all.
In case the moderators and members forgot:
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time should they see fit.
It seems folks don't like what Lisa says but in all honesty, she speaks the truth. Just because it's not sugar coated doesn't make it harsh. I call it blunt but definitely not harsh. One can only react on of two ways: 1) the right way 2) the wrong way. Take heed to what's been said or get "butt hurt" because it wasn't said pretty enough.
I remember a certain member posted a thread trying to "warn" us from another member that was allegedly a "dog fighter" on another forum. Gladly he was proven wrong. His intentions were soley to defame this woman in a public forum with absolutely no proof and that member is still here today.
It's going to be interesting to see how this forum evolves with the amount of moderators we have. I missed the thread before it got edited but Lisa is a long standing member of the forum and she's sure as hell knows to admit fault if indeed she did. I'd hate to see her leave or banned because she's blunt. But remember, she has not breached the forum rules like others have and are still on the board.